Thursday, March 7, 2019
Financial statements Essay
David Sheridan provided statements that did non reflect sphericals circulating(prenominal) financial situation which mislead creditors and investors. Borrowing more money would nurture indicated that the care was in the process of losing assets which would cause stakeholders withdraw and to discontinue expend with the company. This is similar to the Enron scandal, which greatly affected stakeholders not only financi every(prenominal)y further also mor tout ensembley. According the American journal of business (2006), Enrons put across managers chose stakeholder deception and short-term financial gains for themselves, which destroyed their personal and business reputations and their societal standing. After reviewing the AICPAs Articles of Professional Conduct, I believe that David break Article I and III. According to Edmonds, T. (2010), Article I Responsibilities- In carrying turn up their responsibilities as professionals, members should exercise sensitive professional a nd moral judgments in all their activities. Article III Integrity-To maintain and broaden public confidence, members should perform all professional responsibilities with the highest sense of integrity (p. 65). There are three features of the skulker triplicity. Edmonds, T. (2010) states, Opportunity is shown at the head to the triangle because without opportunity fraud could not exist. David found an opportunity that he thought would benefit the company, which allowed Global to hide non-profitable assets in another company without disturbing investors and creditors. It also provided an opportunity, as Global would not need to borrow more money.Edmonds, T. (2010) explains, The second share of the fraud triangle recognizes pressure as a key fixings of misbehave. A manager who is told either make the numbers or you are fired is more exchangeablely to cheat than one who is told to tell it like it is. (p.67). I believe that David felt the pressure as to produce results in order to keep the business from failing. The third element of the fraud triangle is rationalization. According to Edmonds, T. (2010), Few individuals think of themselves as evil. They develop rationalizations to justify their misconduct (p. 67). I believe David and the others involved believed that they were not actually defrauding the people since they had plan to balance the sheets on the financial statements when the economy picks up or the business stock prices rise.ReferencesEdmonds, T. (2010). Survey of Accounting, 2nd Edition (2nd ed). McGraw-Hill Primis Custom Publishing.Petrick, J. A., & Scherer, R. F. (2006). The Enron Scandal and the conk out of Management Integrity Capacity. American journal of business, 18(1), 126.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.